5 to me.
Looking at what's underneath WDSC / RDi I stil don't understand why native Linux support hasn't been considered from the start.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
_________________________________
Heinz Sporn
TE - iSeries Systeme & Kommunikation
voestalpine Stahl Service Center GmbH
Industriezeile 28
4020 Linz, Austria
T. +43 / 50 304 / 19 - 466
M. +43 / 664 / 83 62 355
F. +43 / 50 304 / 597 - 466
mailto:heinz.sporn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.voestalpine.com/stahlservicecenter
voestalpine - Einen Schritt voraus.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Joe Pluta
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2008 16:12
An: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries
Betreff: [WDSCI-L] RDi and Linux
In my session at Rational, George Farr asked the audience who thought
that having RDi on Linux was important. Only one or two hands went up.
Although this really wasn't a session on RDi, it was on RDi-SOA, and the
audience was more non-i people than i people, it was still a little
surprising to me.
I then began to wonder whether my own personal anti-Microsoft bias is
really skewing my perception. Personally, if I were running an IT
department I'd be very interested in a pure Linux network. With the
exception of a couple of specific-use programs, I don't use Windows-only
products anymore and I'm pretty happy. My biggest issue today is that I
have to use Windows for RDi.
On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being very important and 1 being not
important at all, how would you rate the importance of having RDi
running on Linux?
Joe
midrange.com
