|
>> but i *will* echo
>> Aaron's statement, RPG *should* have native GUI capabilities
*without*
>> all the extra gyrations, wrappers, etc.
>This is the classic example of "It's not gonna happen, so why waste
cycles on it?"
>The more time people spend arguing on a native GUI for the 5250, the
less time we
>spend on implementing real solutions.
Usually on midrange.com lists people say, "Speak up and speak out." Why
is it the desire for a native i5/OS GUI should be any different? I'm
betting that people aren't requesting it and at the same time planting
their feet down and refusing any other forward momentum. I share the
opinion that IBM should be developing a native GUI environment and that
it would only add to the survivability (not to mention growth) of the
system. My 2 cents.
Kurt Anderson
Application Developer
Highsmith Inc.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.