×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Dave Shaw skrev den 04-02-2008 20:02:
Buck,
Exactly. For some reason, my employer's customer number is a closely guarded secret, and of course all problem reports have to go through the 'proper channels'. I guess somebody, either on our side or IBM's, doesn't want 150 developers talking to IBM directly.
It is very interesting to see the difference in attitude between the
Eclipse users and the WSDCi users (not intending to offend anybody BTW).
Eclipse users actively throw in bug reports, enhancement requests and
suggestions of how to do things, and the development effort is very
clear as you get the feeling that the Eclipse project appreciate this
and that the users are a part of each bug resolving. It is hard to
explain in writing, but I get the feeling that my input is valuable and
important, both as a reporter but also in order to figure out how to
solve it (if a discussion is needed). The barrier to getting stuff to
the Eclipse project is low, just create a user on bugzilla.
Is the WSDCi customer potential so big that the traditional IBM approach
can pay off? Basically I suspect that IBM want to sell hardware, not
software as such.
Thorbjørn
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
