×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Joe Pluta wrote:
I went so far as to say they should actually charge more for ADTS than
for RDi, thus giving people an incentive to move to the new tools as
they become comfortable.
That surprises me, Joe. Given all the guff that IBM got over
implementing the green-screen tax, and saying it was a hardware cost.
And it reminds me of a political dispute in a town near my home where
the former city council added a $25 per month tax to the water bill for
"police protection". The issue isn't that the citizens don't want
police protection. It's that the council sought to get around a law
requiring a popular vote for a tax increase by adding a fee to the water
bill. What does police protection have to do with water usage? People
say that issue alone cost a couple council member's their seats in the
last election.
It's bad enough to milk one customer base in order to subsidize another,
but charging more for ADTS than RDi borders on rediculous.
Nathan.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
