Re: WDSC vs SEU -- WDSCI-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: WDSC vs SEU
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:45:24 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l>
List-help: <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:wdsci-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From: Vernon Hamberg

I add my vote to changing CLP to CLLE - there is a performance gain,
and the only commands to worry about, mostly, are RCLRSC, which
behaves differently, and TFRCTL, which can't be used in ILE CL.

OVRxxx works a bit differently as well due to the OVRSCOPE keyword, but I
think the defaults work fine 99% of the time. I'm a little fuzzy on the
details.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: WDSC vs SEU , Jerry Adams
Re: WDSC vs SEU , Vernon Hamberg

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.