|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We use Implementer, and I find it quite reliable as long as you make a few allowances and use the Implementer workbench to do all object and source moves. WDSC can be used for editing, and it can use the Implementer compile commands, via an add-on integration dll, which also helps to keep Implementer informed about where everything is. As long as you have a module and a binding directory named the same as the service program, even service program compiles are a snap. Implementer keeps track of dependencies and will automatically compile all programs that use a module when you promote it. It does seem to fall down when you try to go around it, and then want it to understand what you've done, but I don't think that's Implementer's fault. Pete Hall pbhall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://pbhall.us Alan Campin wrote:
I used Implementor and it sucked big time (Try a whole day to get a couple of programs installed and then having to do it again) and it's support for this kind of thing was terrible.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF/aX+pcZsDl8OX6kRArjcAJsHeKA/F1Rye4ka85Jwfcaw9IHNSQCgoQc3 p3HPnXC5VnppUBcCQu7RTI8= =wWNr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.