× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




                I cant give specific data but can say that my WDSCi tutorials 
website page takes approx 150 hits per day. Somebody must be either learning or 
using WDSCi.

Don Nitke

----------------------------------------

                                From: "albartell" <albartell@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 12:56 PM
To: "'Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries'" <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Advanced vs. Standard 

How scientific are these opinionated numbers? I tell/ask every client I get
in touch with if they are using WDSC (usually anyways). I think a lot more
developers are at least trying WDSC than we think. Here are some stats for
the number signed up for the WDSC list (toward bottom) which puts us at 799
of people just listening here. 

http://www.midrange.com/liststats.htm

I think we could safely quadruple that number to maybe 3200? (scientific, I
know) That's a lot of developers given how relatively small the iSeries
market is.

Maybe another good measure would be how many people download updates to WDSC
- IBM would have those numbers.

Thoughts?
Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ryberg, James
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 2:04 PM
To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries 
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Advanced vs. Standard

That's exactly what I'm talking about. A good percent of programmers are
not even using WDSCi...

Thanks, James

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Buck
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 2:02 PM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Advanced vs. Standard

Sounds like IBM will get real earful at > the next Common conference
from programmers.

Aside from the dozen or so active posters to this list, WDSCi is essentially
unknown to RPG programmers. Unless there's a secret underground of WDSCi
users we don't hear from on this list, there won't be a long line howling
about the AE situation.
--buck


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.