RE: [WDSCI-L] Continuation line problems with 5.1.2.2

[CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

Vern,

Thanks for the info.  I might play around with that.  I'd like to keep the
syntax checking on if I can.

I'm not sure that it is the new line causing the problem or the line you
just pressed enter on.  I think it's the line you pressed enter on, but
perhaps you're correct in saying that it's the new line causing the problem.

Perhaps one of the IBM people on the list can jump in with an answer.  (Don,
Eric or Violaine are you listening?????  <grin>)

What's really strange is that sometimes, the syntax checker works and I
don't get an error when continuing lines.

Charles Wilt
iSeries Systems Administrator / Programmer
Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America
ph: 513-573-4343
fax: 513-398-1121
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vernon Hamberg [mailto:vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:33 PM
> To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries
> Subject: RE: [WDSCI-L] Continuation line problems with 5.1.2.2
> 
> 
> My mistake, Charles - never had to use this, and it's been a 
> while. Am glad 
> to know about it, however.
> 
> I think I found an answer, though. At any rate, I tried this and get 
> similar results, I think. When I press ENTER, I get "RNF3301E 
> The Name 
> entry is not valid; specification ignored." I think this is 
> of nuisance 
> value only, as it applies to the new line just added, I think.
> 
> To suppress it, you can turn off automatic syntax checking in 
> Preferences. 
> The problem is, it inserts a line with only the spec letter 
> ("D" in this 
> case), and that line does not pass syntax checking as is. 
> Same thing has 
> been bugging me in the RPGIII editor, too.
> 
> You can also keep syntax checking by turning off the option 
> to repeat the 
> previous specification. This would insert a blank line, which 
> will pass 
> muster. Just tried it, it was just what I want.
> 
> Vern
> 
> At 03:33 PM 10/28/2004, you wrote:
> >Vernon,
> >
> >You're incorrect.
> >
> >The procedure name isn't too long.  That's what the ellipses 
> are for.  You
> >could have a procedure named
> >
> >d ThisIsAnEvenLongerProcedureName...
> >
> >Since the ellipses are there, the line doesn't have a syntax 
> error.  Thus,
> >the syntax checker shouldn't be giving an error.
> >
> >
> >Charles Wilt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries  
> (WDSCI-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
> or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
>