RE: Removing a plug-in -- WDSCI-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

If there's a problem with WDSC (and that will include the underlying pieces), this list is not necessarily the best place to get support - you should use the appropriate channels to get IBM support, assuming you have the support contract in place at your company. Almost everyone does, and this has worked very well for me. Bringing up problems with the CL prompter, e.g., in this list would not have been so helpful as making the call (or submitting the problem on the 'Net, which I really like doing). Unless someone from Toronto happened to notice it.

JMHO
Vern

At 12:39 PM 10/5/2004, you wrote:

And I don't mean to slam IBM. It's not lost on me that I've received some
excellent support from IBM developers through this very list.

Maybe what is needed is less a change in how IBM supports the WDSCi-Eclipse
combination than an explicit and easily located clarification of IBM's
support given that half of the combination is open source. That is, maybe
it's a marketing issue more than a technical issue.  But it would still be
nice to have the clarification from IBM itself.

Thanks,
Kelly

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.