|
> I'm a little worried that everyone posting > which such high hardware requirements > will put of those with older PC's, in > departments with tight hardware budgets > from even trying WDSCi. It'll just be another excuse. Those same departments didn't try WDT and ADTS/CS either, despite running on modest PCs and being free of additional charge. > Prior to that, I was happily using WDSC 4 > on my home computer, a PIII 450 > with 640mb, again including the WTE. I could not even load WDSCi 4 on a PII 450 with 128mb. > As with most java-based applications, > memory is more important than > processor speed. Absolutely right! --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.