|
> From: Michael Patton > > At the risk of being labeled a crank, I'd tell you that I think (even > without visible documentation) the web site designer is already a lot > better > than FrontPage. And I say that without being one of the folks who doesn't > like FrontPage - it's a fine product, but I haven't used it in forever, > since WDsc's new capabilities hit the scene. I agree, Michael. I used FrontPage and I thought it was nice. But WDSC has it beat for ease of use and flexibility. The web site designer is almost completely intuitive (although I had to change the view to "hanging" from its default view). You can have as many templates as you need and apply them as necessary. It's nice to create a home template, a node template and a leaf template, and then be able to apply them at the various levels with just a couple of clicks. Add to that the fact that the template language, if they ever get around to documenting it, is really powerful. Even though I had to do everything through trial and error, it was quite nice. What they're really going to need at some point is the ability to debug the templates as the code is being generated. But given the nature of Eclipse, I can't believe that's impossible. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.