|
We were also looking for your banana cream pie!!!!!! -----Original Message----- From: steven_fuller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Nov 10, 2003 3:17 PM To: System 21 Users <system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [SYSTEM21] Save while Active We have been performing a save while active for over a year. It kicks off from ROBOT at 12:01am, we bring the JBA Background jobs down via shut down programs as well as communications for Future Three. We also bring down all of our interactive users and start a save while active with *SYNCLIB on only the necessary libraries. SAVLIB LIB(AEGINW352 FUTBARCODE FUTBARPRNT FUTCP FUTDTALIB FUTMODS FUTMAP FUTVRDTA4 OSL@@F3 OSLMODS TLABARCODE TLACS) DEV(TAP01) ENDOPT (*LEAVE)SAVACT(*SYNCLIB) SAVACTWAIT(120) SAVACTMSGQ(QSYSOPR) ACCPTH(*NO) We use ROBOT to monitor for message id CPI3712 telling us that the checkpoint processing is finished, on average about 10 from shutting down JBA to bringing our JBA production users back on line. We bring production users on line and perform the necessary Future Three jobs, ie shift, and after that we bring the remainder of the jobs up. The actual save time will run for another 45 minutes. So.. Our manufacturing people are down for a total of about 8 to 10 minutes and our shipping is down for about 18 to 20 minutes. Everything runs very smooth and wasn't too bad to set up. And yes we have tested several times with several different libraries, and not necessarily because I wanted to. The times are as low as i can get them with out a faster machine or doing purges. We are running a 620 with 2 gig of memory. The data size we are saving is as follows and the size is in 1,000,000 bytes ... (Embedded image moved to file: pic00293.pcx) ALSO, We use a 2 Hour limit as well and have had no problems with data integrity. Train the users not to be in an option when they will be away for an extended period of time, and yes this does mean beatings!!!! . As for finance - it doesn't happen often and it isn't hard to recover a session. Once you understand all the locks and the reasons why subsystems don't come up you can easily program around it. So, when the system comes down at night for back ups we still go clear the locks and checking everything via programs that all is cool. And since it isn't good getting a call at 1am we make sure everything was cool when we set this all up. My 1/2 cent Steven "Jeff Klipa" <jklipa@xxxxxxxxxxx To: system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx > cc: Sent by: Subject: RE: [SYSTEM21] Save while Active system21-bounces@mi drange.com 11/10/2003 10:58 AM Please respond to System 21 Users Chris, Thanks for bringing that up... Your point is completely valid and accurate. We've had to resort to public floggings on occasion and users have been well trained to not leave posting sessions and maintenance screens unattended... We don't really have a problem with that any more (knock wood)... More likely a powerfailure will get us than the inactivity timer these days... Your point is well taken and anyone would do well to consider it before actually using the inactivity timer. Great point... ----Original Message Follows---- From: "Chris Tringham" <ctringham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: System 21 Users <system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "'System 21 Users'" <system21@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [SYSTEM21] Save while Active Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 12:10:50 +0800 Jeff, I am not sure about the wisdom of using the Inactivity Timeout facility on the iSeries in combination with System21. In fact I have advised some companies against using it because of the possibility of corrupting data in S21, especially in the Finance applications. My concern is that a 2 hour limit could catch someone who leaves a session running during the day (especially over lunch). S21 doesn't handle these terminations very elegantly, and if users were in the middle of posting a transaction strange things can happen. At the very least it creates a record in the System Manager dumps file and an error report on OSLDUMPS, which someone ought to be investigating. This can happen for any number of reasons, including PC or network problems, power being switched off, etc., etc., and I'd prefer to minimise the amount of work in checking these "errors". I don't have better suggestions (other than public flogging for any users who leave sessions running when they leave the office), but I just thought I'd raise this issue in case anyone else has any bright ideas. Chris _______________________________________________ This is the System 21 Users (SYSTEM21) mailing list To post a message email: SYSTEM21@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/system21 or email: SYSTEM21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/system21. _________________________________________________________________ MSN Messenger with backgrounds, emoticons and more. http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_customize _______________________________________________ This is the System 21 Users (SYSTEM21) mailing list To post a message email: SYSTEM21@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/system21 or email: SYSTEM21-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/system21.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.