|
Why do you need to charge more for the parts, extra labour, materials, tooling, etc? -----Original Message----- From: Jeff_Klipa/Harvard@harvardind.com [mailto:Jeff_Klipa/Harvard@harvardind.com] Sent: 05 December 2002 16:07 To: jbausers-l@midrange.com Subject: [SYS21] Re: [SYS21] Multiple Cost Senters for a Work Station... They have different costs associated with the different parts... So when they run part A on PRES1 they might charge $1.00 and when they run part B they might charge $10.00... They need to be able to book their production using the Workstation but have the correct costs associated with that part... The fact that it is the same physical press should not make any difference to the software, and I don't think it will if I define a different logical workstation, i.e. double define PRES1 as PRESA... We don't do finite scheduling (mostly because JBA can't do it correctly) so there won;t be conflicts of trying to run the two different parts on the same machine at the same time... The most important thing is to book with the correct costs... I think the double defining will work but I just wanted to make sure there were not any gotchas I am not seeing... Thanks. Doug333@aol.com on 12/05/2002 10:51:27 AM Please respond to jbausers-l@midrange.com To: jbausers-l@midrange.com cc: (bcc: Jeff Klipa/Harvard) Subject Re: [SYS21] Multiple Cost Senters for a Work : Station... -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Jeff, Whoa. What's the business reason for doing this? AFI? Can't we come up with another field to split out Part A from Part B? Doug In a message dated 12/5/2002 8:48:25 AM Central Standard Time, Jeff_Klipa/Harvard@harvardind.com writes: > We have a situation where we are running two different parts on PRESS1 and > we > want to be able to associate a different cost center to the work station we > call > PRESS1 depending on which part we are running on that work station... We > are > not using Work Centers. > > The only way I can think of is to double define the PRESS1 workstation as > PRESS1 > for one part and PRESSA for the other part... > > Is there a better way to do this...? > > Is there a problem if I do this...? > > Thanks in advance for your comments. _______________________________________________ This is the GEAC/JBA System 21 Users (JBAUSERS-L) mailing list To post a message email: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/jbausers-l or email: JBAUSERS-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/jbausers-l. _______________________________________________ This is the GEAC/JBA System 21 Users (JBAUSERS-L) mailing list To post a message email: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/jbausers-l or email: JBAUSERS-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/jbausers-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
