[SYS21] Multiple Cost Centers for a Work Station...

They said run rates are different...









Steve Dodkins <Steve.Dodkins@ebm-ziehl.co.uk> on 12/05/2002 11:54:56 AM

Please respond to jbausers-l@midrange.com



  To:          "'jbausers-l@midrange.com'"
               <jbausers-l@midrange.com>

  cc:          (bcc: Jeff Klipa/Harvard)



  Subject      RE: [SYS21]   Re: [SYS21] Multiple Cost
  :            centres for a Work Statio     n...







Why do you need to charge more for the parts, extra labour, materials,
tooling, etc?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff_Klipa/Harvard@harvardind.com
[mailto:Jeff_Klipa/Harvard@harvardind.com]
Sent: 05 December 2002 16:07
To: jbausers-l@midrange.com
Subject: [SYS21] Re: [SYS21] Multiple Cost Senters for a Work Station...


They have different costs associated with the different parts...
So when they run part A on PRES1 they might charge $1.00 and when they run
part
B they might charge $10.00...
They need to be able to book their production using the Workstation but have
the
correct costs associated with that part...

The fact that it is the same physical press should not make any difference
to
the software, and I don't think it will if I define a different logical
workstation, i.e. double define PRES1 as PRESA...

We don't do finite scheduling (mostly because JBA can't do it correctly) so
there won;t be conflicts of trying to run the two different parts on the
same
machine at the same time...  The most important thing is to book with the
correct costs...

I think the double defining will work but I just wanted to make sure there
were
not any gotchas I am not seeing...

Thanks.







Doug333@aol.com on 12/05/2002 10:51:27 AM

Please respond to jbausers-l@midrange.com



  To:          jbausers-l@midrange.com

  cc:          (bcc: Jeff Klipa/Harvard)



  Subject      Re: [SYS21]   Multiple Cost Senters for a Work
  :            Station...







--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Jeff,
Whoa.   What's the business reason for doing this?  AFI?  Can't we come up
with another field to split out Part A from Part B?
Doug

In a message dated 12/5/2002 8:48:25 AM Central Standard Time,
Jeff_Klipa/Harvard@harvardind.com writes:

> We have a situation where we are running two different parts on PRESS1 and
> we
> want to be able to associate a different cost center to the work station
we
> call
> PRESS1 depending on which part we are running on that work station...  We
> are
> not using Work Centers.
>
> The only way I can think of is to double define the PRESS1 workstation as
> PRESS1
> for one part and PRESSA for the other part...
>
> Is there a better way to do this...?
>
> Is there a problem if I do this...?
>
> Thanks in advance for your comments.

_______________________________________________
This is the GEAC/JBA System 21 Users (JBAUSERS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/jbausers-l
or email: JBAUSERS-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/jbausers-l.




_______________________________________________
This is the GEAC/JBA System 21 Users (JBAUSERS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/jbausers-l
or email: JBAUSERS-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/jbausers-l.
_______________________________________________
This is the GEAC/JBA System 21 Users (JBAUSERS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/jbausers-l
or email: JBAUSERS-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/jbausers-l.