|
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] This has as many layers as an onion. :) My next question is: do you want to reconcile the cost on the stockroom detail, inventory transactions, and production transactions to a cost set? If not, I dont see any reason to go back to the original cost set. If so, better hunt up those backup tapes. Regards, Doug In a message dated 9/24/2002 5:28:09 AM Central Daylight Time, clawson@ambrake.com writes: > Here is the exact situation that we have. > A copy was not done. There was not an issue of a user copying a cost set > and deciding that they did not like the name. > Someone had a tool that they could use to programatically change the name > of cost sets from one name to another. They changed the names of two cost > sets, one which had been used for about a year, and one which is being used > for business plan development. Somehow this makes it easier to pull data > into an Access Data Base for the Purchasing Department's use. This was > done before any testing or research was done on the implications of such an > action and before user buy in was achieved. The original cost sets are now > gone and have been replaced with something else. > Luckily, a file was created with the old cost set data. What I'm trying to > figure out is this. If I allow the new cost set names to remain, are there > implications that I am not aware of, or would it be wiser to have the old > cost sets restored? > > Thanks
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.