× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



As for item 2 (last receipt date is blank) we have found and fixed this
problem internally and also reported it to JBA...  Believe it or not this
was a Y2K BUG...!!!   ;)

It does appear that this problem was actually fixed in PTF P#VSC20002
(Object) P#VSS20002 (Source) - Service Pack 3.

Program VS310 - Mod mark - VSV3_0207   KCX 25/02/98 Wrong last receipt
information

If you do not have this PTF or this Mod mark then the following might apply
to you...

If you compare the last receipt date printed on the Schedule with the
actual records shown in the PMP09 file you will see that the Century digit
is ignored in the calc spec of the VS310 Program when the last receipt date
is calculated...  I gave them the exact lines of code where the DATE
WORK Fields are clearly defined as 6^0 long instead of 7^0 long...
There is a Y2K bug in the Print Vendor Schedules program VS310...
This is in standard product for 3.5.1 and 3.5.2B...!!!
This is the code directly from the OSLVSS3/QRPGSRC source file...

VS310
0633.00      C          MOVE *ZEROS    RCDCMP  60 *VSV3_0119 960527
0634.00      C          MOVE *ZEROS    RCDSV1  60 *VSV3_0119 960527
0635.00      C          MOVE *ZEROS    RCDSV2  60 *VSV3_0119 960527
These date work fields are only 6^0 long so the century digit is being
lost...
The fix is simple enough...  just make them 7^0 long and problem solved...

However, as we see in their fix in the PTF mentioned above under mod mark:
VSV3_0207   KCX 25/02/98 Wrong last receipt information
Their fix took a far more comprehensive revision to the logic involved in
calculating the last receipt information...

Good luck...






"Muir, Betsy" <BMuir@newcor.com> on 11/03/2000 10:01:23 AM

Please respond to JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com
                                                              
                                                              
                                                              
 To:      "'JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com'"                         
          <JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com>                           
                                                              
 cc:      (bcc: Jeff Klipa/Harvard)                           
                                                              
                                                              
                                                              
 Subject: RE: Vendor Scheduing and Service Pack 3             
                                                              






Hi Michele:
Here are the problems we are having.  They are significant enough for us to
cancel install of SP3 that was scheduled for 11/11.  Our main reason for
the
install is that we are working on a project to "put" our vendor schedules
out on a web site for our suppliers (target date for pilot - mid November)
and want to make sure we had the latest release of VS in place.
1.   Vendor schedule detail records created from MRP with status code 40
(quantity change) no longer have the purchase order on them (file VSP45).
If they are in the firm order range, they are adding the quantity on to the
existing purchase order when processed.  The part number we were testing
should have 40,000 due on 11/20 but after running vendor scheduling 8 times
on the item, the purchase order is showing 320,000 due.
2.   The last receipt date on the vendor schedule print is blank for all
300+ items that we vendor schedule. (This was reported to JBA.)
3.   The cumulative quantity printing on the vendor schedule has a bug.
The arrears quantity on an item is causing the cumulative quantity on the
next item to be increased by the arrears quantity from the prior item.
(This was reported to JBA.)
I don't think many companies are using vendor scheduling.  There are no VS
fixes in the UK fix pack or the US fix pack that we applied to SP3 - this
leads me to believe that it hasn't been fully checked/tested in the install
base.
Betsy


+---
| This is the JBA Software Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message send your mail to JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: doug333@aol.com.
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.