> >The 36 didn't have object level security.
> It did, although it was implemented differently than on the S/38 and
> And you had to turn "resource security" on separately from signon
> AFAIK, the whole concept of "authority holders" on the 400 were
implemented to
> ease the transition from 34/36 resource security.  This is because
on the 34/36
> it is common to have non-persistent objects which need to have
> retained and applied when the object is recreated.

Thanks, I didn't know that.

I do remember authority holders.... don't like 'em :)


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.