Re: [Security400] Authority annoyances, continued...

["John Earl" <johnearl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>
> I suspect that Joe was at a shop, like I was, where security was not
an
> afterthought, and they locked down the files properly when they put
them in
> production - when it's a routine, it's easy to forget.  I remember
being
> horrified when they announced the /400 and I found out what Levels
10 and 20
> were - maybe they were necessary for marketing reasons, but they
certainly
> weren't improvements in my mind.


QSECURITY level 20 was to support the S/36 environment.... The 36
didn't have object level security.
QSECURITY level 10?   Ya got me.  I don't know what that was created
for.

jte

--
John Earl - VP & CTO
The Powertech Group
253-872-7788
johnearl@powertechgroup.com
www.powertechgroup.com