|
Am 20.04.2024 um 14:31 schrieb Barbara Morris <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>:or *OFF, but I think it would be more useful if it returned -1, 0, or 1.
There's an Idea that would help with comparing data structures:
https://ibm-power-systems.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/IBMI-I-1376
It is suggesting a compare-corresponding built-in function.
The Idea assumes that a new %COMPCORR built-in function would return *ON
-1: (ds1 is less than ds2)
0: (ds1 is equal to ds2)
1: (ds1 is greater than ds2)
But that would make it impossible to use the function like
if %compcorr(ds1:ds2);
...
So maybe we need more than one function:
if %isequal(ds1:ds2);
and
if %compare(ds1:ds2) = *zero;
Those functions could be data type agnostic - comparing data structures
"correlating" - comparing arrays element-wise - and so on.
Or both functions need a procedure pointer to a "comparator function" than
returns exactly that -1/0/1 result - also to help functions like sort - at
least this is what C has done.
Regards,
Daniel
--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.