× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. March 2022

Re: Looking for activation group opinions



On 3/5/2022 12:03 PM, Code 1109 via RPG400-L wrote:
Alan, in generally speaking, to get a better pgm performance and if you know that a pgm or series of pgms are going to be called more than once in a job then it's better to use a 'named' activation group and have the called pgms use that one or *CALLER.The reasoning behind this, is that named actgrps are not deleted/destroyed when the job ends, they remain inactive/dormant for when the pgm(s) are called again.

Is this true, that "named actgrps are not deleted/destroyed when the job ends"?

Sam


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.