RE: Can files be opened local to a "subprocedure"?

Vern, you can add the STATIC keyword to the F-Spec in the sub-procedure to
keep the file opened.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards

Birgitta Hauser


"Shoot for the moon, even if you miss, you'll land among the stars." (Les
Brown)
"If you think education is expensive, try ignorance." (Derek Bok)
"What is worse than training your staff and losing them? Not training them
and keeping them!"
?Train people well enough so they can leave, treat them well enough so they
don't want to.? (Richard Branson)


-----Original Message-----
From: RPG400-L <rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Vern
Hamberg
Sent: Samstag, 9. Oktober 2021 03:00
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Can files be opened local to a "subprocedure"?

Well, so far as I know, when a file is defined in a subprocedure, basically
you have a fresh open when the SP is called, and a close when it exits -
nothing is maintained between calls.

USROPN gets the same behavior - again, so far as I know.

Vern

On 10/8/2021 7:38 PM, James H. H. Lampert via RPG400-L wrote:

On 10/8/21 5:27 PM, Vern Hamberg wrote:

Now are maybe there issues of maintaining the position where you left
off in one of the files?

Of course there are. The record contents can be thrown out (the
recursion is very close to strict tail-recursion), but the position
and the EOF state can't. That is the whole point of the question, and
why opening it locally to the procedure invocation appears to be the
only way, short of caching the entire contents of the file.

And performance is not an issue. The file to be opened locally has an
absolute maximum of 55 records, and an absolute maximum of 49 records
that would satisfy the key conditions.

So far, in my tests, it appears that (at least at V6), simply moving
the F-spec to procedure level requires me to treat the file as
program-described, and define a structure to receive the record, but
treating externally-described files as program-described is old hat
around here. Apparently scatter-gather doesn't work for files declared
at procedure level?

--
JHHL

--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a
message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or
change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link:
https://amazon.midrange.com