× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Sorry this is a bit long, my life history.
When every thing was on cards, or tape I never used RPG .  Program code, data, everything, on punch cards.
Drop a stack of cards and if you dont have a sort column you are in big trouble.
But if all you had was punch cards for data, opcodes like CHAIN SETLL/READ  are meaningless.
The RPG cycle automated the code you would otherwise have to constantly reinvent when processing sorted stacks of punch cards.
I started on S/3  RPG II.  Report Program Generator, when you got to truly understand the cycle it made writing Reports really really easy and quick.
Without firstly using SORT in CL I hardly ever used the RPG cycle (memory fades)  S/3 had no LGL files. But it did have ADDROUT sort, a primitive LGL file.
It was not really possible to use the cycle without the data being sorted in the proper order.
RPG II and RPGIII had EXCPT and CHAIN and ways to code to out of the cycle.
There was no interactive programing. Until later when S/3 got an add-on CCP and monitors,  oooohhh  so very mysterious.
SO because all was batch programming almost every program had a Primary file  and every program used the RPG cycle.

Interactive CCP programs did not need a primary file (from memory I could be wrong).
This was also a time when if you tried to access a locked record you got an instant program crash.
One became very very careful to code for record lock control and always always always minimise record lock time,
S/38 spoilt us with automatic record lock waits.

SQL is so powerful that with a single SQL statement I could do what an entire batch program did.
The thing SQL doesnt  have is report headings and footings and totals and page breaks.
So to a cycle addict with MR and L1 on their mind you need to show them a way to get Headings and footings and totals and page breaks, using SQL.

I agree with Don Brown. Excel is a powerful way to transition away from reports.
I used Excel VB script to access DB2 via odbc  and SQL in the script and drop the SQL data directly into Excel,
It is a quick modification to drop report data into a file, you dont need to put in headings footings etc. This makes the SQL to retrieve the data trivial.
You can put code in the scripts to control when the SQL  was, and was not, allowed to run (month-end etc)
You can even put in the Excel script, code to create Headings and pivot tables so the client can access the data as they need.

Train the client in the power of Excel , you can still produce the paper reports, dont scrap the paper yet.
Eventually ask the client if they still want the paper report and why.  Invariably they will say for archive purposes.
Now its time to introduce electronic archiving, you will never print paper again.

So for data processing, SQL with Excel, can extinct RPG  even for data archiving.

ps
Auditors dont like Excel and they say it is prone to manipulation,
so I gave the auditors ways to run the SQL scripts they could cross check with their own DB access tools.
That kept them happy.

fwiw
Frank




On 18/06/2021 4:37 am, Niels Liisberg wrote:
The funny thing is that SQL nowadays have a feature similar to the L1 L2
etc. take a look at ROLLUP and CUBE

tor. 17. jun. 2021 kl. 20.19 skrev Reeve <rfritchman@xxxxxxxxx>:

I don't think the RPG Logic cycle was ever mandatory. But the lack of
iteration opcodes (DO, FOR, ITER, LEAVE) and the necessary reliance on
GOTO's made bypassing it painful.

Using the logic cycle and control breaks saved untold hours of programming
(and debugging) time. I have many customers unwilling to go to SQL solely
because they fear giving up L1; that's an education process on top with
thoughtful change management hidden underneath.

\reeve

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:00 AM Justin Taylor <jtaylor.0ab@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

" why use RPGLE with cycle logic"

Beats me. My best guess is that it dates back to when the cycle was
mandatory.


date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:56:56 -0500
from: Ignacio Garcia <cascada3405@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Commit & Logic cycle

Is a good idea....and why use RPGLE with cycle logic ?





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.