× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Nah.  Can't be "spot on", I never get things right the first time, haha.

I think its a bug. Its easy to work around by moving the prototype out of Proc1, or eliminating the prototype entirely (what's the point of a prototype for a procedure with no PI that's in the same module?) but... its probably a bug and should be reported to IBM.

On 11/12/2020 3:10 PM, Mark Waterbury wrote:
IIRC, some of this behavior was changed recently, e.g. with recent TR levels, for at least 7.3 and 7.4 ... so, your idea of "missing PTFs" may be "spot on"?  :-)


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.