|
There are many things which I've found much faster on a PC than on an
IBM i. My intuition says this is almost all down to the respective
roles and design choices of the systems being compared. The
performance of the IBM i doesn't seem to be affected much as you add
users and workload. If I have too many things running on my
single-user PC, I start to notice.
I would agree here, except that I'm using a Power 8 (41A) with just one
user in this case. Should have much more "horsepower" than my PC.
(should being the operative keyword here... haha).
Actually, my point is that the IBM i runs more-or-less the same
whether you have 1 user or (let's keep it real safe here) 10.
Compared to the PC, the IBM i at 1 user is dog slow. Then, at 10
users, the IBM i is running at basically the same speed as it did for
1 user, but the PC in all likelihood is struggling under the load.
The IBM i *does* have much more horsepower than your PC, but it
achieves it by generating prodigious torque limited to low revs, like
a freight train engine. The PC is more like a sports car.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.