Re: Full Free RPG and modification marks

Whoever said full free requires something like Git - I disagree - I'll be happy to use Turnover for this - of course, at this time, I'm limiting myself as to line length since I'm using a source PF. If one moves to putting source in IFS, then maybe Git or other source versioning is in order - besides, isn't there a distinction between CMS and source-version-control? If it's a distinction without a difference, OK.

I do wonder what the CMS players are doing vis a vis source in IFS - TO has the ability to manage IFS files, but I don't think it's tied to source as such.

Regards
Vern

On 10/7/2019 7:48 AM, aec wrote:

And neither did I.

On 10/2/19 1:39 PM, John Yeung wrote:

I wish you would take some care in getting the attribution right. I
didn't say that.

John Y.

On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:42 PM Jack Woehr
<jwoehr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 10:35 AM aec <cfuture@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wednesday, October 2, 2019, 9:26:46 AM EDT, John Yeung
<gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

   > Full free pretty much requires a CMS like Git.  And in fact, that's

my

biggest kick against it.