Re: Full Free RPG and modification marks

[Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Whoever said full free requires something like Git - I disagree - I'll 
be happy to use Turnover for this - of course, at this time, I'm 
limiting myself as to line length since I'm using a source PF. If one 
moves to putting source in IFS, then maybe Git or other source 
versioning is in order - besides, isn't there a distinction between CMS 
and source-version-control? If it's a distinction without a difference, OK.

I do wonder what the CMS players are doing vis a vis source in IFS - TO 
has the ability to manage IFS files, but I don't think it's tied to 
source as such.

Regards
Vern

On 10/7/2019 7:48 AM, aec wrote:
> And neither did I.
>
> On 10/2/19 1:39 PM, John Yeung wrote:
> > I wish you would take some care in getting the attribution right. I
> > didn't say that.
> >
> > John Y.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:42 PM Jack Woehr
> > <jwoehr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 10:35 AM aec <cfuture@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wednesday, October 2, 2019, 9:26:46 AM EDT, John Yeung
> > > > <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >    > Full free pretty much requires a CMS like Git.  And in fact, 
> > > > > that's
> > > > my
> > > > > > biggest kick against it.