Re: Looking for free format equivalent -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Looking for free format equivalent
From: Brian Parkins <goodprophet.bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 21:03:15 +0100
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on IBM i <rpg400-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

You'll need to give us a little more to go on, Greg.

In what way is %LOOKUPLE behaving differently? Can you show us an example you have tried?

Has PRDS been sorted as an ascending array before attempting the %LOOKUPLE?

Brian.

On 02/05/2019 20:38, Greg Wilburn wrote:

The other problem I'm running into is that %lookuple doesn't seem to function like the old:
C indate lookup prds(x) 2030

I need to find the array element that is equal to, or less than the value I'm looking up with.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.