× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On 10/29/18, 11:11 AM, Sam_L wrote:
FWIW: Consider telling the compiler to optimize, and redo your benchmark.

Back somewhere around 2007 I inherited a program that did extensive
text/string manipulation. It ran slowly, but optimizing made a huge
difference. There is, of course, no guarantee it will help now, but it
doesn't cost much to try.

Compiler optimization does make a difference (37 seconds vs. 195 seconds for 1000 records, with a per-record range of 2-302 milliseconds, vs. 5-1661 milliseconds), but it's still a disproportionately large amount of time.

--
JHHL


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.