|
On 10/29/18, 11:11 AM, Sam_L wrote:
FWIW: Consider telling the compiler to optimize, and redo your benchmark.
Back somewhere around 2007 I inherited a program that did extensive
text/string manipulation. It ran slowly, but optimizing made a huge
difference. There is, of course, no guarantee it will help now, but it
doesn't cost much to try.
Compiler optimization does make a difference (37 seconds vs. 195 seconds
for 1000 records, with a per-record range of 2-302 milliseconds, vs.
5-1661 milliseconds), but it's still a disproportionately large amount
of time.
--
JHHL
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.