|
On 12/21/2017 9:16 AM, Luis Rodriguez wrote:
Excuse my ignorance but, What do you mean with timestamp " isn't enough anyTIMESTAMP records down to the microsecond (us - the 'u' is supposed to
more (no ns support)"?
emulate the Greek letter mu), and with a fast processor it is possible
to commit a pair of transactions in the same microsecond. If TIMESTAMP
resolved nanoseconds (ns) then that 'uniqueness' would be restored for
another few generations of processors :-)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.