× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




Another thing to follow Buck's train of thought:

What if the two programs [A & B] that were running were reading the number as "next to be used", and functioned properly. But, a third program [C] interpreted the data area as "last used". That would also cause the problem.

For example, program A ran successfully, and then B ran successfully. When B completes, the data area contains 5, meaning the next use of the data area would be to indicate "use 5 next".

Then program C runs, and the logic thinks 5 was last used, so program C increments the data area, uses 6, and puts 6 in the data area [last used]. Then program A or B run again, and see the 6. They interpret the 6 as the next to be used, and cause the crash, because program C has already used 6 because it's data area access logic is not the same.

I recently had this happen, and it is fresh in my mind.

Hope this helps.

Doug


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.