Re: SQL cursor defined two different ways?

On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:06 PM, David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 11/30/2016 10:58 AM, Charles Wilt wrote:
Could you instead have a single cursor defined as a UNION ALL of the
two SELECT statements?

I like this approach. I'm going to experiment with it.

david



--
David Gibbs
midrange.com

* IBM Power Systems Champion

IBM i on Power Systems: For when you can't afford to be out of business!

I'm riding a metric century (100 km / 65 miles) in the American Diabetes Association's Tour de Cure to raise money for diabetes research, education, advocacy, and awareness. You can make a tax deductible donation to my ride by visiting http://lsteml.diabetessucks.net. My goal is $6000 but any amount is appreciated.

See where I get my donations from ... visit http://lsteml.diabetessucks.net/map for an interactive map (it's a geeky thing).

I may have diabetes, but diabetes doesn't have me!
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.