× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I am doing that, as step 1. It works great. Its step 2 thats is troubling me.

Step 1: gather all records for ItemA1.
Repeat for ItemA2, A3, B5, B8. r8, etc.

In the end I will have gathered 30 to 40 records for each of 10 to 60 different items.

I expect to have a separate array and keep track of positioning. Then add each gathering to the end of the array. SQL has surprised so often with flexibility that I did not expect that it seemed reasonable to ask.

On 2/1/2016 3:53 PM, Charles Wilt wrote:
Why not just fetch all 1000 at once?

c/exec sql
c+ fetch myCursor for 1000 rows
c+ into :myOccursDS
c/end-exec

c eval wNumRowsRtn = SQLERRD(3)

Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.