Re: The value of ILE -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: The value of ILE
From: John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:14:31 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "RPG programming on the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 7/20/2014 12:39 AM, John Yeung wrote:

To be clear, I'm not *against* ILE. I think it's nice, actually. And
I do believe that shops that already have widespread ILE use are
better-positioned than those that do not. I'm just not seeing the
pain points that are *solved* (and not traded for other pain points)
by switching from "modular-style OPM" to ILE.

Sub-procedures are not limited to 10 character names.

Thank you for that! It was quite a refreshing response. :)

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.