|
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, at 14:16:35, Rory Hewitt <rory.hewitt@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
CONST means I will try to keep you from changing it but there are plentyof
ways to change the variable inside the procedure and have the calling
variable to be changed.
I agree that it is possible Rory, but not as easy as you are making it
sound.
These include passing as a parameter to a program inside the procedure,
If the receiving program had a PI and the parm was defined as CONST this
is not permitted. The compiler will not permit the programmer to pass a
CONST parm in any way other that as another CONST or VALUE parm.
getting a pointer to it,
As above - not permitted.
putting in a data structure.
Nope - that would be a copy of the data.
The compiler may try to prevent you from changing but it is easy enoughto
change which could result in some really nasty bugs.
The only "easy" way is if the receiving program does not have a PI
defining the parm as CONST. Anything else requires more work.
Jon Paris
www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.