× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, at 14:16:35, Rory Hewitt <rory.hewitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

CONST means I will try to keep you from changing it but there are plenty of
ways to change the variable inside the procedure and have the calling
variable to be changed.

I agree that it is possible Rory, but not as easy as you are making it sound.

These include passing as a parameter to a program inside the procedure,

If the receiving program had a PI and the parm was defined as CONST this is not permitted. The compiler will not permit the programmer to pass a CONST parm in any way other that as another CONST or VALUE parm.

getting a pointer to it,

As above - not permitted.

putting in a data structure.

Nope - that would be a copy of the data.

The compiler may try to prevent you from changing but it is easy enough to
change which could result in some really nasty bugs.

The only "easy" way is if the receiving program does not have a PI defining the parm as CONST. Anything else requires more work.


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.