×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Jerry,

My gut answer would be 'no', but it really depends on how you've coded your
procedure. Any chance of seeing some code?

Rory

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Gerald Kern <jp2558@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have sub-procedure that does file maintenance and the files are opened at
the beginning and closed at the end of the sub-proc.

Key fields are passed, a chain occurs, and if a record is found three
fields are updated.

If the record is not found, the key fields, and the three fields (same as
during update) are written as a new record.

Question:

Is it possible that on a prior call to this sub-proc, where the chain
didn't fail, that all fields in the format are 'available' in memory even
though the sub-proc only references three fields (out of say 25 fields),
and would it be possible for those fields to 'bleed through' (during the
next call of the sub-proc) when the next record is added/written - even if
the file is opened and closed each time the sub-proc is called?


--
Thanks, Jerry

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.