×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Hi Andy,
But can you not still exit the source where the syntax checker had
found the 7.1 enhancements and flagged them as invalid. Then just
create the program or module?
Yes, you can still use SEU to edit the source, ignore the errors it
returns for new features, and it'll compile/run properly.
George Farr did make this clear during his talk.
People also asked if there was a way (without SEU) to jump into a member
and make a quick change on the fly. Like if they are away from their
usual desktop computer, and need to make a really quick change on the
fly. (One of the main things SEU can do that's not solved by RDP)
George said you could still use SEU to solve the problem -- but people
complained that they'd therefore have to buy ADTS which seems like a
waste if you only use it for a quick on-the-fly.
So I suggested (and George agreed) that you could also do this:
EDTF FILE(QRPGLESRC) MBR(MY_SRC_MBR)
It would do no syntax checking, but it'd work. The compiler doesn't
know which editor you used -- so it'll still compile without a problem.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
