Re: Multi-defined Fields: SQL Precompiler (Jerry Adams) -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Thanks for that link Chuck. It looks like they are gearing towards
some kind of XML integration. The "future" keyword that worries me the
most is "ID". I have several tables that use ID for a primary key that
is build as an IDENTITY field.

--
James R. Perkins

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:50, CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Voris, John wrote:

Is "PROCESS" a reserved word in SQL ?

When I remove the $Process procedure, its prototype, and
invocation, (no other changes) the program compiles.

FWiW: The token PROCESS is not a reserved SQL word\identifier, as
of DB2 for IBM i 7.1:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v7r1m0/topic/db2/rbafzwordsre.htm

Regards, Chuck
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.