× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. September 2009

Re: declaring a file local to a sub-procedure

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:11:32 -0500, rpg400-l-request wrote


"Yes, as discussed a lot of times, being able to pass the file would be hugely
beneficial to "simplify" a lot of code. Anybody heard anything about this
being supported any time in the near future?"

It is supported in the past! In other words it _is_ in 6.1. Sorry - thought
i had made that clear in my post but I see it could have been mis-read to mean
that I was hoping to see it.

Just to clarify. The ability in 6.1 to pass files as parms is in my opinion
more important than the ability to have a private file in a subproc.


Jon Paris
Partner400
www.Partner400.com


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.