Re: declaring a file local to a sub-procedure

Hey Jon,
Yes, I read that as a wish. As if they missed that feature in 6.1. Thanks
for clarifying.




Thanks
Bryce Martin
Programmer/Analyst I
570-546-4777



"Jon Paris" <Jon.Paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
09/30/2009 09:20 AM
Please respond to
RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
Re: declaring a file local to a sub-procedure






On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:11:32 -0500, rpg400-l-request wrote


"Yes, as discussed a lot of times, being able to pass the file would be
hugely
beneficial to "simplify" a lot of code. Anybody heard anything about this
being supported any time in the near future?"

It is supported in the past! In other words it _is_ in 6.1. Sorry -
thought
i had made that clear in my post but I see it could have been mis-read to
mean
that I was hoping to see it.

Just to clarify. The ability in 6.1 to pass files as parms is in my
opinion
more important than the ability to have a private file in a subproc.


Jon Paris
Partner400
www.Partner400.com