× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. July 2009

Re: Passing a pointer between programs when using a dynamic call -- clarification attempt

Hi Adam -

On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:07:29 -0400, Adam Glauser
<adamglauser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think this is a good suggestion, but instead of having program B call
the setup procedure, why not have program A call the setup procedure?
Then program B doesn't need to have the data passed to it at all, though
it might need to be passed some sort of handle that service program C
can handle multiple "clients" simultaneously.

I got the impression that program A was not allowed to make any
procedure calls. But if that restriction only applied to program A's
calls to the program Bs, then yes, program A calling a setup procedure
in srvpgm C directly is better.

From Stefan's description of the process, I don't _think_ there would
be multiple "clients" simultaneously, only sequentially.

Ken
Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views
of my employer or anyone in their right mind.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.