×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 21/07/2008, at 5:55 AM, M. Lazarus wrote:
I have run into this limitation, and would very much like IBM to
add in OR capability to compiler directives.
Perhaps we need to open a DCR?
Aren't the LOOKUPxx / TLOOKUPxx opcodes far more egregious than the
TRIMx opcodes, when it comes to implementation?
They certainly extend the ugliness but I think the rot started with %
TRIMx. Once that sort of design error has been made it becomes easier
to perpetuate it. I concede that %TLOOKUP may add some documentation
value (i.e., obvious that you're processing a TABLE) but the various
xx variants could have been replaced with a parameter selecting *EQ,
*GT, etc.
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
