×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 19/06/2008, at 11:22 PM, Joe Pluta wrote:
Andy Hautamaki wrote:
Barbara;
Would that mean if say in V6R2 a new BIF was added you could not
use it in
SEU?
That's exactly what it means, Andy.
That's simply not true! SEU will behave exactly as it has in the past
when a new feature/keyword has been added to a language (possibly via
PTF) but SEU was not updated at the same time. That is; you can still
use SEU, you can use the new BIF or Op-code, SEU may flag a syntax
error but you can save the source in spite of the errors and compile.
As long as the COMPILER finds nothing wrong with the source a program
will be created.
I do this even now because SEU doesn't always like my constructs. For
example:
/if defined(FBN_USE_PREFIX )
D fbnConvert PR 8F
/else
D convert PR 8F
/endif
D EXTPROC('fbnConvert')
The compiler is quite happy with that construct but SEU complains
about the final line:
Keyword is not allowed for a parameter definition; keyword is ignored.
SEU is interpreting the line as part of a parameter definition when
it is really part of the PR.
I'm curious cause this might push the remaining developers in our
shop to
use WDSC/RDI........
And that's the ultimate goal. IBM wants to stop supporting two
sets of
tooling for the i. They'd like everyone to get onto the Rational
tools.
I'm still a little concerned as anybody that what happens when your
network goes down and you need to do some work on your box. At this
point, you can at least still use SEU. Several releases down the road
that might not be the case, at least not with full syntax checking.
Eventually SEU will become more like EDTF in that it won't catch
syntax
errors (or probably more likely it will see errors that don't exist).
So the network is down killing your client IDE to host connectivity.
Why would this not also kill your emulator to host connectivity? Or
are you thinking of some other form of connexion that doesn't involve
the network (such as private HMC link)?
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.