×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




if the job that allocated the memory ends, the pointer will point to
unreserved memory, and produce the same sorts of "unpredictable
results"
that you'd have with a buffer overflow

Interesting. "unpredictable results" is not the same as "tried to refer
to an object that does not exist" :) So I've still got access to that
memory space? And whatever ends up there next?

If you truly want to have a pointer ot memory that's shared across
multiple jobs, there are two much safer ways:

Agreed. However, looking at the api docs (v6r1) there's no mention of
what happens if you don't detatch and then delete the shared memory
space. If I allocate shared memory and then my job ends, it would seem
the memory is still allocated. Hence, a cross-job memory leak.

-Walden


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.