× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. February 2008

RE: Cant see the wood for the trees

Alan,

The subfields of a data structure defined as follows:

D PFX E DS Extname(Filename)
D QUALIFIED

are referred to as PFX.FLD1, PFX.FLD2, PFX.FLD3, etc.
(where the fields in Filename are named as FLD1, FLD2, FLD3, etc.)


------------------------------

message: 5
date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:51:03 -0500
from: Alan Shore <AlanShore@xxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Cant see the wood for the trees

Sorry - I'm getting all flummoxed
Let me re-write that
I understand that the field names P99filename1 etc NEVER had
data placed in
them, hence the "empty" output file.
What I really mean is that the field names that I had in the program
P99.fieldname1 etc were NOT really defined anywhere.
Why did it compile? Why was I able to EVAL them in debug?



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.