× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Alan Shore wrote:
But surely that's the point
The field names I had written as
P99.filename1 and NOT P99filename1

Well, the P99.filename1 field was still valid, since you declared it with:
D P99 E DS Extname(Filename)
D QUALIFIED

It just didn't have anything to do with the input/output fields defined by the F-spec.

Personally, I'm looking forward to the ability in V6R1 to specify and F-spec that doesn't generate any I-specs/O-specs. If you'd done that, I think the compiler would have complained that you didn't specify the P99 DS on the READ and WRITE statements.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.