Re: ON-ERROR catches CPF2103 but not CPF2110 -- RPG400-L

Good News Everybody!

A new search engine is coming soon.

As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.

Subject: Re: ON-ERROR catches CPF2103 but not CPF2110
From: Scott Klement <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 14:32:13 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Yes, they should both be in QILE.

Is this also the case with the doCmd() subprocedure? (That would be the one that's failing, right?)

albartell wrote:

In other words, are you doing any cross-activation group calls within your

call stack?

The service program with sub proc obj_addlible is compiled with
ACTGRP(*CALLER). The *PGM calling obj_addlible is compiled with
DFTACTGRP(*NO) ACTGRP(QILE), which equates to them both running in QILE,
correct?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: ON-ERROR catches CPF2103 but not CPF2110 , albartell

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.