RE: ON-ERROR catches CPF2103 but not CPF2110

Is this also the case with the doCmd() subprocedure? (That would be the

one that's failing, right?)

The doCmd sub proc was local to the program calling obj_addlible, and yes,
that is the one that is failing. Note my other response to Rob Dekko that
it only fails in WDSC's debugger, but when I use STRDBG it behaves like I
would think it should.

Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Scott Klement
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 2:32 PM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: ON-ERROR catches CPF2103 but not CPF2110

Yes, they should both be in QILE.

Is this also the case with the doCmd() subprocedure? (That would be the one
that's failing, right?)

albartell wrote:

In other words, are you doing any cross-activation group calls within
your

call stack?

The service program with sub proc obj_addlible is compiled with
ACTGRP(*CALLER). The *PGM calling obj_addlible is compiled with
DFTACTGRP(*NO) ACTGRP(QILE), which equates to them both running in
QILE, correct?

--
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or
change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.