|
And that said, give the guy a friggin' break! He said his
point was aimed at the ones who say the cycle is obsolete. I
agree with him that it has its place in coding with faster
efficiency, and he already said if he had known SQL he
probably would have done it with SQL.
Geez, he did the thing in two lines, and here two weeks later
I can see my old RPG students, veteran Cobol programmers,
wandering around in confusion, asking, "Yeah, but where do
you read the file? Yeah, but how do you input the file
records?" And the C++ guys (in which I'm a newbie but future
master) are wondering how you can do that without any
includes or prototypes or functions or brackets!
Now I also encourage him to learn SQL, he'll get there. I am
myself moving to do all my new file stuff in SQL now, just
because IMO IBM is going to expand on SQL for database use,
not on DDS, they've said so, therefore it's the curve of time
coming this way. But even there, I find myself often
"emulating" the cycle when it's a report with totals and all that...
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.