× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. October 2006

Re: Workaround for 32767-byte and 32767-element limits?

On 10/2/06, Chris Pando <chris.pando@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 10/2/06, James H H Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is there a workaround for the 32767-byte limit on the
> length of a character standalone field or DS subfield,
> and/or the 32767-element limit on arrays?
>
> I'm asking on behalf of a colleague, and I don't fully
> understand myself what the purpose is here, but I believe
> they are to be used as some sort of communication buffer.
>
> --
> JHHL

>

The procedure _C_TS_malloc (in the service program
QC2UTIL3) allows you to allocate up to 2TB in the
heap.

HTH,

Chris
--
chris@xxxxxxxxx
www.brilligware.com
Home of MineSweeper5250


D'oh. 2 GB.

Chris

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.